Machines are Already Better at Sourcing Candidates Than Recruiters

     

This year's ERE show for the recruiting industry was full of sourcing tools that not only search your ATS database, but also social networks and the web.  Some even look at your job descriptions and learn and refine the results of the sourcing as you rank them.  

Screen Shot 2017-06-30 at 3.38.55 PM.png

You may be skeptical. Is it really working? Is it really better than our sourcers?  Well, the response has been proven in an article by Jim Stroud, where he  describes the results of the SourceCon Grandmaster Competition, the equivalent of deep blue against kasparov but for sourcers. The results rank the machine in third place among over 10 of the best sourcers in the world.  The only difference is that the machine did the job in 3.2 seconds while the best sourcer took 25 hours. For me the vast time difference makes the benefits and the winner pretty clear.  

So yes, the machine is better!  

It is paradoxical and brave that the association of people making a living off of it, put themselves out of work!

About The Author

Yves Lermusi (aka Lermusiaux) is CEO & co-founder of Checkster. Mr. Lermusi is a well known public speaker and a Career and Talent industry commentator. He is often quoted in the leading business media worldwide, including Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, Business Week, and Time Magazine. His articles and commentary are published regularly in online publications and business magazines. Mr. Lermusi was named one of the “100 Most Influential People in the Recruiting Industry” and his blog has been recognized as the best third party blog.